Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 15;8:144. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-8-144

Table 2.

Comparison of PSPT vs. IMRT, IMPT vs. IMRT, and IMPT vs. IMRT for three lung volumes: total lung (minus PTV), contralateral lung, and ipsilateral lung

 
 
PSPT vs. IMRT
IMPT vs. IMRT
IMPT vs. PSPT
    ∆ (%) p value ∆ (%) p value ∆ (%) p value
Total lung
V5
−22.8
0.002
−41.7
<0.001
−24.5
0.001
 
V10
−8.6
0.2
−37.3
<0.001
−31.4
<0.001
 
V20
2.9
0.7
−34.5
<0.001
−36.4
<0.001
 
V30
22.1
0.005
−26.2
0.001
−39.6
<0.001
 
Mean (cGy)
−7.3
0.2
−38.4
<0.001
−33.5
<0.001
Contralateral lung
V5
−29.4
<0.001
−52.8
<0.001
−33.1
<0.001
 
V10
22.1
0.006
−26.2
0.001
−39.6
<0.001
 
V20
−1.7
0.8
−42.5
<0.001
−41.5
0.002
 
V30
15.7
0.009
−27.5
0.03
−37.3
<0.001
 
Mean (cGy)
−17.1
0.006
−47.3
<0.001
−36.4
<0.001
Ipsilateral lung
V5
−13.5
0.02
−26.1
<0.001
−14.6
0.007
 
V10
−5.8
0.3
−25.6
<0.001
−21.0
<0.001
 
V20
5.1
0.4
−23.9
<0.001
−27.6
<0.001
 
V30
18.8
0.007
−19.4
0.009
−32.1
<0.001
  Mean (cGy) 2.3 0.6 −23.9 <0.001 −25.6 <0.001

Delta represents change of first technique listed versus baseline comparison technique (second listed).