Table 8. Unadjusted and adjusted predictors of being offered an ITN in the CSComs.
| Potential predictors | ITNs | ||||
| Unadjusted | Adjusted | ||||
| n | OR (95% CI) | p | OR (95% CI) | p | |
| Socio-demographic | |||||
| SES group | |||||
| 1 (poorest) | 61 | 1.0 | 0.008 | 1.0 | 0.002 |
| 2 (very poor) | 54 | 0.55 (0.28, 1.06) | 0.37 (0.14, 0.97) | ||
| 3 (poor) | 42 | 1.19 (0.26, 5.34) | 5.74 (0.14, 229.2) | ||
| 4 (less poor) | 13 | 0.25 (0.53, 1.13) | 0.06 (0.02, 0.17) | ||
| 5 (least poor) | 16 | 0.37 (0.02, 6.64) | 3.15 (0.36, 27.21) | ||
| Process factors | |||||
| Reason for visit | |||||
| ANC | 148 | 1.0 | 0.02 | 1.0 | 0.24 |
| ANC & illness | 40 | 0.48 (0.26, 0.89) | 0.41 (0.08, 2.05) | ||
| Report malaria | |||||
| No | 159 | 1.0 | 0.07 | 1.0 | 0.04 |
| Yes | 30 | 0.56 (0.30, 1.07) | 17.71 (1.24, 252.1) | ||
| Palpate | |||||
| No | 60 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.02 | |
| Yes | 127 | 3.78 (1.63, 8.77) | 0.006 | 4.62 (1.35, 15.75) | |
| HIV at PMTCT | |||||
| No | 171 | 1.0 | 0.05 | 1.0 | 0.07 |
| Yes | 18 | 0.07 (0.01, 0.95) | 0.04 (0.001, 1.47) | ||
| Pay for consult | |||||
| No | 154 | 1.0 | 0.04 | 1.0 | 0.01 |
| Yes | 35 | 0.11 (0.01, 0.85) | 0.07 (0.01, 0.43) | ||
| Money spent on travel | |||||
| 129 | 1.0 | 0.05 | 1.0 | 0.32 | |
| 31 | 0.93 (0.18, 4.66) | 0.96 (0.09, 10.14) | |||
| 27 | 0.33 (0.14, 0.75) | 0.14 (0.01, 1.91) | |||
| Total money spent | |||||
| <500 | 8 | 1.0 | 0.05 | 1.0 | 0.002 |
| 500–999 | 49 | – | – | ||
| ≥1000 | 117 | 5.8 (0.97, 34.57) | 8.79 (2.74, 28.23) | ||
Notes:
n, number of events; OR, Odds Ratio, CI, Confidence Interval; SES, Socio-economic Status; ANC, Antenatal Clinic; HIV, Human Immunodeficiency Virus; PMTCT, Prevention of Mother to Child Transmission.