Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Feb 7;24(9):1489–1494. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2044-8

Table 1.

Demographics of the fecal incontinence study population compared with the population with no fecal incontinence

Fecal
incontinence
N=588 (%)		 No fecal
incontinence
N=527 (%)		 p value
Age (mean ± SDa) 58±13 54±15 <0.001
BMI (kg/m2) (mean ± SD) 31±8 30±7 <0.001
Ethnicity/race % 0.29
Hispanic 33 43
Non-Hispanic 47 38
White 12 10
Native American Other 8 9
Depression 175 (30) 106 (20) <0.001
Alcohol use 188 (32) 172 (33) 0.84
Partner 302 (52) 310 (60) 0.009
Sexually active 242 (43) 278 (54) 0.001
ISI (mean ± SD) 7±4 6±4 <0.001
CRADI-8 (mean ± SD) 39±24 14±16 <0.001
POPDI (mean ± SD) 39±26 30±24 <0.001
UDI-6 (mean ± SD) 58±25 44±25 <0.001
PFDI-20 (mean ± SD) 135±62 87±50 <0.001
aPISQ-12 (mean ± SD) 30±8 33±7 0.001
aPISQ-9 (mean ± SD) 22±6 24±6 <0.001
a

Only completed by sexually active women