Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 27;10:E107. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.120331

Table. Comparison of CDC Tobacco Control Recommendations Applied in Comprehensive Cancer Control Plans, 2007 and 2012.

Recommendation Plans Applying Recommendation
2007 Analysisa (n = 39) Current Analysisb (n = 69) P Valuec
Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs ( 8 )
State and community programsd 97% (67)
Health communications interventionse 63% 83% (57) .02
Cessation programs 87% 88% (61) .81
Surveillance and evaluation 53% 97% (67) <.001
Administration and management 40% 84% (58) <.001
The Guide to Community Preventive Services: Tobacco Use Prevention and Control ( 7 )
Smoking bans and restrictions 84% 87% (60) .69
Increase the unit price of tobacco products 47% 72% (50) .009
Mass media campaigns when combined with other interventions 61% 81% (56) .02
Provider reminders when used alonef 19% (13)
Provider reminders with provider education 71% 19% (13) <.001
Reducing client out-of-pocket costs for cessation therapies 71% 49% (34) .03
Multicomponent interventions that include client telephone support 50% 65% (45) .12
Community mobilization with additional interventionsg 59% (41)
Smoke-free policies to reduce tobacco useg 70% (48)
Incentives and competitions to increase smoking cessation when combined with additional interventionsg 3% (2)

Abbreviations: CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; —, comparison of data for 2007 and 2012 not possible because of changes in tobacco control recommendations since 2007.

a

Based on a previous analysis of 39 comprehensive cancer control plans; the previous analysis reported only percentage of plans, not number of plans (11).

b

Number of plans provided in parentheses.

c

P value derived from χ2 test of homogeneity; P <.05 considered significant.

d

State and community programs comprised separate recommendations in 2007 (11).

e

Referred to as “counter marketing” in 1999 recommendations and 2007 analysis (11).

f

“Provider reminders when used alone” was not included in previous analysis (11).

g

These 3 recommendations were added after previous analysis (11).