Table 1. Description of the species monitored in this study and possible use of the methods used in this study.
Species | Mean Snout-Vent-Length (SVL) | Pattern used forindividual recognition | CMR | Occupancy rate | Number of calling males | Distance sampling | Most promising monitoring strategy |
Dendrobates tinctorius | 43 | dorsal, ventral and lateral pattern | Yes | Visual | No | No | CMR |
Ameerega hahneli | 23 | ventral pattern | No | Audio | Yes | Yes | Occupancy rate and Number of calling males |
Allobates femoralis | 20 | ventral pattern | No | Audio | Yes | Yes | Occupancy rate and Number of calling males |
Allobates granti | 16 | lateral band | No | Audio | Yes | No | Occupancy rate and Number of calling males |
Anomaloglossus baeobatrachus | 15 | lateral band | No | Audio | Yes | No | Occupancy rate and Number of calling males |
Rhinella margaritifera | 57 | dorsal and ventral pattern | Yes | Visual | No | No | Occupancy rate |
Rhinella lescurei | 36 | dorsal and ventral pattern | No | Visual | No | No | Undertermined |
Atelopus flavescens | 36 | dorsal pattern | No | Visual | No | No | Undertermined |