Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 28;8(6):e67353. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067353

Table 2. Soil physical factors of five natural secondary forest types.

Natural secondary forest type
Chemical factor Chinese pine Sharptooth oak Chinese pine+Sharptooth oak Armand pine Wilson spruce
Root content ++ +++ ++ ++ ++
Sand (%) 19.70(0.77)a 32.96(1.40)b 18.80(1.56)a 14.61(0.36)c 28.84(0.38)d
Silt (%) 52.01(1.64)a 51.16(1.09)a 64.42(2.35)b 66.05(2.51)b 65.14(1.61)b
Clay (%) 28.29(1.82)a 15.88(1.77)b 16.78(2.06)bc 19.35(1.49)c 6.20(0.08)d
BD (g/cm3) 1.08(0.08)a 0.89(0.05)b 1.14(0.04)a 1.11(0.04)a 1.06(0.03)a
Porosity (%) 3.29(0.20)a 24.12(1.14)b 16.20(1.95)c 13.69(0.65)c 20.19(2.68)d
WHC (%) 22(1)a 20(2)a 21(1)a 17(1)b 16(1)b

BD, bulk density; WHC, water holding capacity. Values are means±SD and letters denote significant differences among forest types (P = 0.05).