Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychooncology. 2013 Feb 25;22(9):2064–2070. doi: 10.1002/pon.3259

Table 3.

Correlations among Behavioral Outcome Measures (N=109)

Behavioral
Measure
POMS
TMD
CES-D STAI-S SF-36
Physical
PSS
Global
CRA IES PSQI Cg
Distress
Cg
Wellbeing
POMS TMD 1 .805** .796** −.201* .817** .521** .499** .542** .933** .792**
CES-D 1 .687** −.202* .778** .512** .492** .488** .894** .748**
STAI-S 1 −.059 .711** .362** .502** .463** .875** .645**
SF-36-Phys 1 −.132 −.293* .011 −.159 −.139 −.483**
PSS Global 1 .477** .413** .430** .888** .687**
CRA 1 .405* .360** .534** .761**
IES 1 .407** .648** .535**
PSQI 1 .547** .732**
Cg Distress 1 .804**
Cg Wellbeing 1

Note. Cg Distress = factor analysis score of POMS, CES-D, STAI-S, PSS, IES; Cg Wellbeing = z score of Cg Distress + SF-36-Physical (inverted scores) + PSQI + CRA. Pearson correlations coefficients are reported for all outcomes except for associations with SF-36 Physical, which was non-normally distributed and for which Spearman’s rho are reported.

*

p < .05 (2-tailed).

**

p < .001 (2-tailed).