Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 28;3(6):e002264. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002264

Table 3.

ORs (95% CIs) of having diarrhoea among family members according to access to a quantity of improved water: results of logistic analysis, the 2009 baseline survey of the Kathmandu Valley Water Distribution, Sewerage and Urban Development Project, Kathmandu Valley, Nepal

Variable Univariate Multivariate
Model 1(−) Model 2(+)
Basic access (20 L/c/d) to improved water source
 Fully covered 1 1 1
 Partially covered 1.52 (1.05 to 2.21) 1.12 (0.69 to 1.82) 1.09 (0.64 to 1.85)
 Not covered 0.92 (0.59 to 1.44) 0.74 (0.41 to 1.33) 0.83 (0.42 to 1.67)
Intermediate access (50 L/c/d) to improved water source
 Fully covered 1 1 1
 Partially covered 1.23 (0.74 to 2.03) 0.71 (0.38 to 1.33) 0.67 (0.34 to 1.31)
 Not covered 0.84 (0.48 to 1.49) 0.51 (0.25 to 1.05) 0.56 (0.25 to 1.28)
Optimal access (100 L/c/d) to improved water source
 Fully covered 1 1 1
 Partially covered 2.08 (0.75 to 5.77) 1.82 (0.41 to 7.96) 2.05 (0.45 to 9.31)
 Not covered 1.43 (0.49 to 4.10) 1.22 (0.27 to 5.58) 1.57 (0.32 to 7.61)

Models 1 and 2 were adjusted for demographics, occupation, monthly household income, level of education, ethnicity, drinking water treatment and toilet facilities.

(−)Not adjusted for dummy variables for wards in municipalities/village development committees and (+)adjusted for dummy variables for wards in municipalities/village development committees.