Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 1;347:f3675. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3675

Table 1.

 Epidemiological and descriptive characteristics of 121 reports of network meta-analyses

Item and subcategory No (%) of reports
Journal type
General journal 55 (45)
 With high impact factor 29 (53)
Specialty journal 66 (55)
 With high impact factor 27 (41)
Location of corresponding author
Europe 69 (57)
North America 38 (31)
Asia 8 (7)
South America 3 (2)
Oceania 3 (2)
Funding source
Private 41 (34)
Public 40 (33)
None 15 (12)
Both private and public 7 (6)
Unclear 18 (15)
Medical area
Cardiology 27 (22)
Rheumatology 16 (13)
Endocrinology 12 (10)
Oncology 10 (8)
Infectious disease 9 (7)
Psychiatry/psychology 8 (7)
Neurology 8 (7)
Respiratology 6 (5)
Ophthalmology 5 (4)
Surgery 5 (4)
Other (≤3 reviews per medical area; 11 medical areas) 15 (12)
Type of intervention assessed
Pharmacological intervention 100 (83)
Different class * 72 (60)
Same class * 35 (29)
Any dose of same drug * 12 (10)
Non-pharmacological intervention 11 (9)
Devices * 10 (8)
Surgery or procedure * 7 (6)
Therapeutic strategy or education 5 (4)
Both (pharmacological and non-pharmacological intervention) 10 (8)
Type of network
No of interventions assessed per network† 7 (5-9)
No of comparisons conducted by at least one randomised controlled trial (per network meta-analysis)† 10 (6-15)
No of network meta-analyses with at least one closed loop 103 (85)
No of randomised controlled trials included in network meta-analysis (per network meta-analysis)† 22 (15-40)

Data are no (%) of reports unless stated otherwise.

*Multiple answers were possible, so the total does not equal 100%.

†Data are median (interquartile range).