TABLE 3.
Stimulation sites |
Face |
Forelimb |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Case# | All | Responsive | Total | Aggressive | Defensive | EM | Total | Hand-to-mouth | Defensive | Reach | Hindlimb/trunk | Simple |
03-56L | 74 | 51 68.9% |
40 | 6 15% |
34 85% |
– | 1 | – | 1 100% |
– | – | 10 |
03-64L* | 162 | 112 69.1% |
66 | – | 66 100% |
– | 34 | 15 44% |
18 53% |
1 3% |
2 | 10 |
03-74R | 83 | 65 78.3% |
18 | 8 44.4% |
10 55.6% |
2 | 32 | 10 31.3% |
11 34.4% |
11 34.4% |
– | 13 |
04-04L* | 212 | 179 84.4% |
119 | 9 7.6% |
110 92.4% |
7 | 32 | 7 21.9% |
13 40.6% |
12 37.5% |
6 | 15 |
04-07L* | 347 | 320 92.2% |
99 | 25 25.3% |
74 74.7% |
– | 207 | 95 45.9% |
112 54.1% |
– | 11 | 3 |
04-39L* | 323 | 295 91.3% |
61 | 4 6.6% |
57 94.4% |
44 | 150 | 38 25.3% |
92 61.3% |
20 13.3% |
10 | 30 |
04-47R* | 203 | 183 90.1% |
21 | 18 85.7% |
3 14.3% |
– | 156 | 44 28.2% |
104 66.7% |
8 5.1% |
4 | 2 |
05-15L | 26 | 21 80.8% |
12 | 8 66.7% |
4 33.3% |
– | 8 | 4 50% |
3 37.5% |
1 12.5% |
– | 1 |
05-20L | 58 | 39 67.2% |
27 | 17 63% |
10 37% |
– | 10 | 2 20% |
4 40% |
4 40% |
– | 2 |
05-28L* | 90 | 76 84.4% |
9 | 9 100% |
– | – | 42 | 2 4.8% |
23 54.7% |
17 40.5% |
11 | 14 |
All | 1578 | 1341 85% |
472 | 104 22% |
368 78% |
53 | 672 | 217 32.3% |
381 56.7% |
74 11% |
44 | 100 |
Asterisks mark cases in which the multiple sites along the depth of intraparietal sulcus were stimulated.