Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Comp Neurol. 2009 Dec 20;517(6):765–782. doi: 10.1002/cne.22181

TABLE 3.

Number and Percentage of All Stimulation Sites (Dorsolateral PPC + the Depth of IPS) from Which Different Complex Movements Were Evoked by ICMS

Stimulation sites
Face
Forelimb
Case# All Responsive Total Aggressive Defensive EM Total Hand-to-mouth Defensive Reach Hindlimb/trunk Simple
03-56L 74 51
68.9%
40 6
15%
34
85%
1 1
100%
10
03-64L* 162 112
69.1%
66 66
100%
34 15
44%
18
53%
1
3%
2 10
03-74R 83 65
78.3%
18 8
44.4%
10
55.6%
2 32 10
31.3%
11
34.4%
11
34.4%
13
04-04L* 212 179
84.4%
119 9
7.6%
110
92.4%
7 32 7
21.9%
13
40.6%
12
37.5%
6 15
04-07L* 347 320
92.2%
99 25
25.3%
74
74.7%
207 95
45.9%
112
54.1%
11 3
04-39L* 323 295
91.3%
61 4
6.6%
57
94.4%
44 150 38
25.3%
92
61.3%
20
13.3%
10 30
04-47R* 203 183
90.1%
21 18
85.7%
3
14.3%
156 44
28.2%
104
66.7%
8
5.1%
4 2
05-15L 26 21
80.8%
12 8
66.7%
4
33.3%
8 4
50%
3
37.5%
1
12.5%
1
05-20L 58 39
67.2%
27 17
63%
10
37%
10 2
20%
4
40%
4
40%
2
05-28L* 90 76
84.4%
9 9
100%
42 2
4.8%
23
54.7%
17
40.5%
11 14
All 1578 1341
85%
472 104
22%
368
78%
53 672 217
32.3%
381
56.7%
74
11%
44 100

Asterisks mark cases in which the multiple sites along the depth of intraparietal sulcus were stimulated.