Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Nov 1;132(1):275–285. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1848-9

Table 4.

Annualized Rates and Multivariable-Adjusted Risk of Invasive Breast Cancer Among women with and without New-Onset Breast Tenderness at 12-Month Follow-up in the WHI Estrogen-Alone and Estrogen + Progestin Trials

HT Trial Arm CEE Trial CEE+MPA Trial

Experienced new-onset breast tenderness Did not experience new- onset breast tenderness HR (95% CI) P Experienced new-onset breast tenderness Did not experience new- onset breast tenderness HR (95% CI) P
Cases (N at risk) (%)* Cases (N at risk) (%) Cases (N at risk) (%) Cases (N at risk) (%)

All participants (Active and placebo) 42 (1779) (0.34) 158 (6202) (0.30) 1.04 (0.74, 1.48) 0.81 116 (3231) (0.51) 301 (10149) (0.35) 1.22 (0.97, 1.53) 0.09

Active 22 (1208) (0.26) 62 (2748) (0.26) 0.98 (0.62, 1.53) 0.92 93 (2471) (0.53) 141 (4380) (0.37) 1.33 (1.02, 1.72) 0.03
Placebo 20 (571) (0.50) 96 (3454) (0.34) 1.15 (0.70, 1.88) 0.57 23 (760) (0.43) 160 (5769) (0.34) 1.07 (0.70, 1.63) 0.76
*

Annualized rates

Hazard ratio from Cox proportional hazards models comparing risk of breast cancer among women with versus without new-onset breast tenderness. Cox proportional hazards models are adjusted for HT randomization assignment, age, ethnicity, alcohol consumption, smoking, body mass index (linear and quartiles), physical activity (linear and quartiles), parity, age at first birth, breast feeding, years of age at menopause, Gail model breast cancer risk (linear and quartiles), bilateral oophorectomy, menopausal hormone therapy use prior to trial participation. This table displays hazard ratios for women without baseline breast tenderness.

P-values for comparison of hazard ratios among women with new-onset breast tenderness and women without new-onset breast tenderness.