Table 2. Goodness-of-fit for diCal on simulated bottlenecked history S1 for different sample sizes.
Sample size n | diCal error |
---|---|
2 | 0.2914 |
4 | 0.1901 |
6 | 0.1446 |
8 | 0.0802 |
10 | 0.0899 |
We used the same error metric as in Table 1. As the sample size n increases, the error decreases, with global improvement tapering at ∼8–10 haplotypes.