Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul;194(3):647–662. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.149096

Table 2. Goodness-of-fit for diCal on simulated bottlenecked history S1 for different sample sizes.

Sample size n diCal error
2 0.2914
4 0.1901
6 0.1446
8 0.0802
10 0.0899

We used the same error metric as in Table 1. As the sample size n increases, the error decreases, with global improvement tapering at ∼8–10 haplotypes.