Skip to main content
. 2013 May 11;14:324. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-324

Table 3.

S. cerevisiae GPEA analysis Biological Process for individual chromosomes

S. cerevisiae GRN to PPN
GOID
Term
Size
Edges1
Edges2
pval
GO:0009987
Cellular process
629
389
1509
1.5e-123
GO:0008152
Metabolic process
497
252
1067
7.5e-35
GO:0044237
Cellular metabolic process
481
245
1038
2.25e-33
GO:0044238
Primary metabolic process
450
227
998
1.1e-28
GO:0043170
Macromolecule metabolic process
356
176
854
8.5e-20
GO:0044260
Cellular macromolecule metabolic process
349
173
842
1.15e-19
GO:0006364
rRNA processing
32
18
39
1.2e-13
GO:0016072
rRNA metabolic process
33
18
41
3.45e-13
GO:0042254
Ribosome biogenesis
44
21
56
5.5e-12
GO:0022613
Ribonucleoprotein complex biogenesis
53
23
64
1.05e-10
S. cerevisiae GRN to TRN
GO:0009987
Cellular process
620
200
241
2.25e-51
GO:0008152
Metabolic process
492
131
147
2.905e-10
GO:0044237
Cellular metabolic process
477
127
143
2.747e-09
GO:0044238
Primary metabolic process
446
122
134
1.235e-08
GO:0043170
Macromolecule metabolic process
356
92
104
0.00291
GO:0044260
Cellular macromolecule metabolic process
349
89
102
0.007955
S. cerevisiae TRN to PPN
GO:0009987
Cellular process
631
255
1220
6.5e-63
GO:0008152
Metabolic process
499
160
923
4.15e-12
GO:0044237
Cellular metabolic process
483
153
895
1.95e-10
GO:0044238
Primary metabolic process
452
143
855
8e-09
GO:0044249
Cellular biosynthetic process
252
84
351
4.3e-06
GO:0080090
Regulation of primary metabolic process
144
46
222
6.5e-06
GO:0009058
Biosynthetic process
257
85
355
7e-06
GO:0031323
Regulation of cellular metabolic process
142
45
216
9e-06
GO:0010556
Regulation of macromolecule biosynthetic process
117
36
167
1.35e-05
GO:2000112 Regulation of cellular macromolecule biosynthetic process 117 36 167 1.35e-05

Shown are the top 10 common significant terms between the gene regulatory network (GRN), the transcription regulatory network (TRN) and the protein-protein network (PPN). For ranking of terms the corresponding p-values of common significant terms between two networks were averaged. For GRN to TRN comparison only 6 terms were commonly significant.