Table 1.
Summary of previous studies of osteoarthritis and articular hypermobility.
Study (reference) | Country of origin or ethnic origin | Study design | Number with hypermobility/ Total n (%) | Hypermobility Criteria used | Relationship of joint hypermobility and OA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scott et al 1979 (36) | UK | Clinical population; Age-matched OA-control | 9/100(9%) | Beighton score≥4 & left 2nd MCP joint | In general:
|
Bridges et al 1992 (3) | USA | Clinical observation | 20/130(15%) | Beighton score≥5 | 12 “OA”of 20 hypermobile patients |
Jonsson et al 1995 (34) | Iceland | Established hand OA patients | 19/100(19%) | Beighton score≥4 |
|
Jonsson et al 1996 (35) | Iceland | Established thumb base female OA patients | 17/50(34%) | Beighton score≥4 |
|
Dolan et al 2003 (33) | UK | Postmenopausal community population | 79/716(11%) | Beighton score≥1 |
|
Kraus et al 2004 (32) | Caucasian (UK & USA) | OA sib-pairs family study | 39/1043(3.7%) | Beighton score≥4 |
|
Chen et al 2008-CARRIAGE family study | Mixed Africa and Native American (USA) | Extended family-based study | 36/280(12.9%) | Beighton score≥4 |
|
OA = osteoarthritis; “OA” means type of osteoarthritis not reported; COMP = cartilage oligomeric matrix protein CMC1 = carpometacarpal; DIP = distal interphalangeal; PIP = proximal interphalangeal; MCP = metacarpophalangeal