TABLE 1—
Variable | Black, % | White, % | Male, % | Female, % | Total, % |
Chlamydia | |||||
Model 1a: High race–income disparity group | 34** | −3 | 16** | 8* | 9* |
Model 2b: race–income disparity (continuous) | 13** | 2* | 4* | 4** | 4** |
Gonorrhea | |||||
Model 1a: High race–income disparity group | 28** | 6 | 24** | 17** | 23** |
Model 2b: race–income disparity (continuous) | 11** | 3* | 5** | 5** | 5** |
Primary and secondary syphilis | |||||
Model 1a: High race–income disparity group | 12* | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
Model 2b: race–income disparity (continuous) | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 2 |
Note. Each model included all the control variables. More detailed information on the results for the control variables for each disease model using total rates as the dependent variable can be found in a supplement to the online version of this article at http://www.ajph.org.
Results for model 1 are interpreted as the percentage difference in the dependent variable between the high vs low race–income disparity counties on average.
Results for model 2 are interpreted as the change in the dependent variable associated with a $10 000 increase in the difference between White and Black median incomes on average.
*P < .05; **P < .01.