Skip to main content
letter
. 2013 Jun 4;5(6):1212–1219. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evt088

Fig. 2.—

Fig. 2.—

MMIL. (A) Schematic representation of the intron–exon junction alignment. For all intronic positions, the degree of homology was determined by comparing the consensus splice donor nucleotides GT to the 2 outermost 5′-nucleotides of the 3′ exon and the consensus acceptor nucleotides AG to the 2 outermost 3′-nucleotides of the 5′ exon. Identical nucleotides scored 1, nonidentical scored 0. Noncoding wobble bases were omitted; hence, the score window is maximized to 3. (B) The degree of intron–exon junction homology for intronic positions that suffered from 0, 1, 2, or 3 cases of intron loss. χ2 test (df = 3) was used to compare zero-lost group (n = 73,853) with the groups containing one loss (n = 1,832): P < 0.001, two losses (n = 528): P < 0.001, and three losses (n = 120): P < 0.001. (C) The degree of intron/exon junction homology for Drosophila intronic positions that suffered from zero (n = 99,864) or one or more (n = 1,385) losses (χ2 test, df = 3, P < 0.001). Homology scores for individual nucleotide positions as depicted in figure 3A for (D) Caenorhabditis and (E) Drosophila. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001. (F) A microhomology-mediated end-joining mechanism for intron loss.