Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Emerg Med J. 2011 Dec 8;29(12):e5. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2011-200610

Table 5.

Comparison of Primary and Secondary Outcome Rates and 95% Confidence Intervals for Low-risk and Higher-risk Subgroups among Derivation and Validation Studies

Subgroup Study Combined primary endpoint Inpatient death Serious medical complication Combined secondary endpoint Death within 30 days Readmission within 30 days

Low-risk Auble 1.4% (CI 1.1–1.7) 0.3% (CI 0.2–0.5) 1.0% (CI 0.8–1.3) 7.0% (CI 6.4–7.7) 2.0% (CI 1.6–2.4) 5.0% (CI 4.5–5.6)
Hsieh 2.5% (CI 1.8–3.4) 0.7% (CI 0.4–1.3) 1.7% (CI 1.2–2.5) Not reported 2.9% (CI 2.2–3.9) Not reported
Hsiao 1.7% (CI 0.04–8.9) 0% (CI 0–6.0) 1.7% (CI 0.04–8.9) 10.0% (CI 3.8–20.5) 1.7% (CI 0.04–8.9) 8.3% (CI 2.8–18.4)

Higher-risk Auble 13.3% (CI 12.9–13.7) 5.3% (CI 5.1–5.6) 8.0% (CI 7.6–8.3) 13.3% (CI 12.9–13.7) Not reported Not reported
Hsieh 11.3 (CI 10.6–12.1) 4.5 (CI 4.0–5.0) 6.8 (CI 6.2–7.5) Not reported 10.2% (CI 9.4–10.9) Not reported
Hsiao 8.5% (CI 5.1–13.3) 3.0% (CI 1.1–6.5) 5.5% (CI 2.8–9.7) 30.2% (CI 23.9–37.0) 2.5% (CI 0.8–5.8) 27.6% (CI 21.6–34.4)