Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 12;7(5-6):E411–E416. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.478

Table 1.

Responses to items on the targeted peer reviewer questionnaire

Survey item Reviewer ratings (n=5)
Lowest quality (1) (2) (3) (4) Highest quality (5)

Rate the guideline development methods. 0 0 1 1 3
Rate the guideline presentation. 0 0 2 1 2
Rate the guideline recommendations. 0 0 2 2 1
Rate the completeness of reporting. 0 0 1 4 0
Does this document provide sufficient information to inform your decisions? 0 0 2 2 1
If not, what areas are missing?
Rate the overall quality of the guideline report. 0 0 1 3 1

Strongly disagree (1) (2) (3) (4) Strongly agree (5)

I would make use of this guideline in my professional decisions. 0 1 0 2 2
I would recommend this guideline for use in practice. 0 1 0 2 2