Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA. 2012 Aug 1;308(5):475–484. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.8363

Table 3.

Results of marginal common baseline hazard model, before and after risk adjustment, for endoscopic versus open vein-graft harvesting. Primary analysis of the overall population is presented first, followed by results for the sensitivity analysis.

Unadjusted Risk adjusted
Outcomes Events by
Harvest
Technique
HR 95% CI P
value
HR 95% CI P
value
Overall population, all 989 sites
N=235,394 patients including 122,899 endoscopic (EVH) and 112,495 open vein harvest
Mortality
(through 3 years)
EVH 12,429
Open 13,096
0.99 0.95,1.02 0.454 1.0 0.97,1.04 1.000
Death, MI, or
revascularization
(through 3 years)
EVH 18,419
Open 19,232
1.0 0.97,1.03 1.000 1.0 0.98,1.05 0.344
Wound
complication
(through 30 days)
EVH 3,654
Open 4,047
0.82 0.78,0.86 <0.001 0.83 0.77,0.89 <0.001
Patients at the 165 sites with sensitivity and specificity > 80% for EVH
N=44,423 patients including 25,199 endoscopic(EVH) and 19,244 open vein harvest
Mortality
(through 3 years)
EVH 2,474
Open 2307
0.96 0.90,1.03 0.249 0.95 0.89,1.01 0.097
Death, MI, or
revascularization
(through 3 years)
EVH 3707
Open 3350
1.0 0.94,1.07 .924 1.0 0.94,1.06 0.883
Wound
complication
(through 30 days)
EVH 778
Open 737
0.80 0.72,0.89 <0.001 0.75 0.64,0.89 <0.001

Abbreviation: CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; MI, myocardial infarction.