Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Scand J Work Environ Health. 2012 Dec 12;39(4):325–334. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3337

Table 3.

Summary of meta-analyses of risk estimates in studies with homogenous measures of exposure and in the subsetof higher quality studies (high completeness of reporting and lower likelihood of bias and confounding).

Exposure Meta-analysis Number of
Risk estimates
Meta risk estimate Confidence intervals Test for heterogeneity
Three shift schedule
All studies 7 1.12 0.96 - 1.30 Q=5.1, p=0.53
Better studies 7 1.12 0.96 - 1.30 Q=5.1, p=0.53
Fixed night work
All studies 5 1.51 1.27 – 1.78 Q=3.65, p=0.46
Better studies 5 1.51 1.27 – 1.78 Q=3,65, p=0.46
Working hours
> 40 h/wk All studies 10 1.36 1.25 – 1.49 Q=22.2, p=0.02
Better studies 3 1.17 0.80 – 1.71 Q=9.60, p=0.008
Lifting >100 kg/d All studies 10 1.32 0.93 – 1.87 Q=25.4, p=0.002
Better studies 5 1.02 0.73 – 1.44 Q=7.8, p=0.10
Standing >6 h/d
All studies 6 1.16 1.01 – 1.32 Q=8.9, p=0.11
Better studies (2) (1.26) (0.83 – 1.96) Q=2.9, p=0.09