Skip to main content
. 2013 May 28;13:15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-13-15

Table 4.

Univariate and multivariate regression analysis for DFS and OS in the whole cohort

Variables
Disease-free survival
Overall survival
 
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
  HR 95% CI P value* HR 95% CI P value* HR 95% CI P value* HR 95% CI P value*
Age
1.258
0.872-1.813
0.219
.....
.....
.....
1.359
0.933-1.981
0.110
.....
.....
.....
Gender
0.832
0.535-1.295
0.416
.....
.....
.....
0.759
0.478-1.205
0.242
.....
.....
.....
Location§
0.763
0.558-1.043
0.090
.....
.....
.....
0.751
0.542-1.040
0.084
.....
.....
.....
Surgery
1.034
0.851-1.256
0.738
.....
.....
.....
1.052
0.863-1.284
0.615
.....
.....
.....
pT status¿
1.133
0.782-1.644
0.509
.....
.....
.....
1.118
0.772-1.618
0.554
.....
.....
.....
Differentiation£
1.393
1.065-1.823
0.016
1.411
1.086-1.833
0.010
1.319
1.004-1.734
0.047
1.331
1.020-1.738
0.035
pN statusð
3.211
2.198-4.692
< 0.001
3.096
2.131-4.498
< 0.001
3.032
2.056-4.471
< 0.001
2.926
1.998-4.286
< 0.001
Cystatin SNζ 0.431 0.271-0.685 < 0.001 0.426 0.270-0.672 < 0.001 0.377 0.231-0.616 < 0.001 0.378 0.233-0.614 < 0.001

*Cox proportional hazards model; Age ≤ 57 vs. Age > 57; Male vs. Female; §Upper thoracic vs. Middle thoracic vs. Lower thoracic; Left thoracotomy vs. Thoracic-abdominal-cervical incision; ¿pT1 vs. pT2 vs. pT3 vs. pT4; £Tumor grade 1 vs. Tumor grade 2 vs. Tumor grade 3; ðpN0 vs. pN1/2/3; ζHigh expression of Cystatin SN vs. low expression of Cystatin SN. HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, pT pathologic tumor, pN pathologic node.