Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 25;81(2):567–589. doi: 10.3797/scipharm.1301-16

Tab. 1.

Effect of CPP against carrageenan-induced rat paw edema in rats

Treatment (dose, mg/kg, route) Mean Paw Volume (mL.) ± SEM
PWT in Randall-Selitto assay at 3 h (g ± SEM) (% increase)
0 h 1 h 2 h 3 h
Vehicle control 2.60 ± 0.07 3.65 ± 0.21 4.81 ± 0.21 5.23 ± 0.13 66.00 ± 7.8
Celecoxib (10, p.o.) 2.75 ± 0.07 3.55 ± 0.15 (23.44) 4.43 ± 0.17 (24.04) 4.18c ± 0.29 (45.79) 90.00c ± 7.9 (36.4)
CPP (50, p.o.) 2.79 ± 0.07 3.70 ± 0.19 (12.76) 4.72 ± 0.17 (12.81) 4.84b ± 0.37 (21.83) 74.3 ± 4.08 (12.63)
CPP (100, p.o.) 2.72 ± 0.10 3.24 ± 0.13 (12.28) 4.28 ± 0.05 (29.54) 4.48 ± 0.09 (33.19) 75.00a ± 4.14 (16.66)
CPP (200, p.o.) 2.47± 0.10 3.30 ± 0.10 (21.05) 3.91c± 0.14 (37.27) 4.05c± 0.03 (39.97) 81.0c ± 0.97 (20. 73)

n=6, Data is represented as Mean paw volume (ml.) ± SEM. and was analyzed by Two-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by Bonferroni posttests. Significance represented as

a

P < 0.05,

b

P < 0.01,

c

P < 0.001 as compared to vehicle at respective time point. PWT…Paw withdrawal Threshold.