Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul;19(7):637–643. doi: 10.1089/acm.2011.0888

Table 3.

Comparison of In Vitro Fertilization Live Birth Outcomes in Acupuncture and No Acupuncture Groups

Nondonor Acupuncture group No acupuncture group OR (SE) (95% CI)a
Acupunctureb 104 (52.2) 113 (55.7) 1.04 (0.22)
      (0.68–1.57)
Age (yr)c 34.8±4.32 34.4±4.46 0.87 (0.02)
  (34.2–35.4) (33.8–35.0) (0.83–0.92)
FSH mIU/mLc 10.8±3.26 10.2±3.11 0.92 (0.03)
  (10.4–11.3) (9.8–10.7) (0.86–0.98)
Number of mature oocytes retrievedc 13.4±8.0 15.0±9.0 1.05 (0.02)
  (2–38) (2–49) (1.01–1.07)
Biochemical pregnanciesb,d 11 (5.5) 17 (8.4) 0.60 (0.24)
      (0.27–1.33)
Adverse outcomesb,e 15 (7.5) 22 (10.8) 0.62 (0.22)
      (0.31–1.25)
Donor Acupuncture group No acupuncture group RR (95% CI)f
Acupunctureb,g 20 (87.0) 31 (66.0) 1.31
      (1.02–1.71)
Biochemical pregnanciesb,d 0 (0) 4 (8.5) 0.22
      (0.01–3.96)
Adverse outcomesb,e 2 (8.7) 9 (19.1) 0.45
      (0.11–1.93)
a

Logistic regression models included age, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and number of mature oocytes as covariates and live birth, biochemical pregnancies or adverse events as outcomes.

b

Data are N (%).

c

Mean±standard error (95% confidence interval [CI] for mean).

d

Positive serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin level ≥11 days after embryo transfer.

e

Includes spontaneous abortions, therapeutic abortions, and ectopic pregnancies.

f

Crude, unadjusted risk ratio.

g

Live birth at greater than 24 weeks gestation.

OR, odds ratio; RR, relative risk; SE, standard error.