Table 4.

Multiple Regression Analysis of Wave 1 Perceived Discrimination, Coping Strategy, and Mexican Orientation as Predictors of Adolescents’ Wave 3 Internalizing and Externalizing Problems

	T2 Internalizing Problems			T2 Externalizing Problems
	B	SE	R2	B	SE	R2
Model 1: Main effects			.37			.47
Gender (Female = 1)	2.28*	0.99		1.26	0.90
Mexican Orientation (MO)	−0.73	0.77		−0.19	0.69
Anglo Orientation (AO)	0.80	0.89		0.32	0.81
Perceived Discrimination (PD)	−0.67	0.51		0.09	0.46
Active Coping	−0.43	1.31		0.62	1.19
Distraction Coping	1.96*	0.97		−0.57	0.89
Avoidance Coping	0.02	1.15		−1.28	1.05
Support Seeking (SS) Coping	0.51	1.20		1.23	1.07
Baseline (T1) Outcome	0.50***	.0.07		0.73***	0.07
Model 2:			.39			.49
PD x Active x MO	2.40	1.67		−1.98	1.71
PD x MO	−1.22	0.76		0.74	0.77
PD x Active	−0.49	1.04		1.89*	0.95
Active x MO	0.03	1.34		−1.22	1.25
Model 3:			.39			.49
PD x Distraction x MO	−2.05	1.24		−2.15	1.11
PD x MO	−1.20	0.74		1.17	0.75
PD x Distraction	0.61	0.79		−0.13	0.72
Distraction x MO	−0.58	1.14		−0.26	1.04
Model 4:			.39			.48
PD x Avoidance x MO	1.22	1.81		1.68	1.74
PD x MO	−1.39	0.77		0.91	0.77
PD x Avoidance	−0.02	0.95		−0.64	0.88
Avoidance x MO	−1.72	1.36		−0.16	1.25
Model 5:			.39			.54
PD x SS x MO	1.88	1.13		3.80**	1.27
PD x MO	−1.65*	0.81		0.32	0.74
PD x SS	−0.76	0.83		−2.26**	0.79
SS x MO	−0.42	1.19		1.60	1.08

Note. Models with the three- and two-way interactions also include all main effects.

^***p < .001.

^**p < .01.

^*p < .05.