Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 3.
Published in final edited form as: Q Rev Biophys. 2011 May;44(2):191–228. doi: 10.1017/S0033583510000284

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Drug/inhibitor-binding pockets to HIV integrase as solved experimentally and as predicted by modeling. (a) Preferred (or primary) binding (yellow shading) of the inhibitor 5-CITEP (green) to the active site of the HIV-1 integrase core domain as determined by crystallography (Goldgur et al. 1999); (b) preferred binding (yellow shading) of the anti-HIV drug Raltegravir (purple) to the active site of the prototype foamy virus (PFV) integrase, a structural homologue of HIV-1 integrase, as determined by crystallography (Hare et al. 2010); (c) predicted preferred binding (yellow shading) for Raltegravir to the HIV-1 integrase catalytic core domain as determined by modeling (Perryman et al. 2010); (d) alternative, or flipped binding (turquoise shading) for Raltegravir to the HIV-1 integrase catalytic core domain as determined by modeling (Perryman et al. 2010). C and D are based on PDB entry 1QS4, with missing residues in panel (A) reconstructed by homology. The magnesium ions are shown as orange spheres.