Table 1.
Article | Primary goal | included studies | Quality of systematic review (AMSTAR quality indicators)
|
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Was a priori design provided? | Was there duplicate study selection and data extraction? | Was a comprehensive literature search performed? | Was the status of publication (ie, grey literature) used as an inclusion criterion? | Was a list of studies (included and excluded) provided? | Were the characteristics of the included studies provided? | Was the scientific quality of the included studies assessed and documented? | Was the scientific quality of the included studies used appropriately in formulating conclusions? | Were the methods used to combine the findings of studies appropriate? | Was the likelihood of publication bias assessed? | Was the conflict of interest included? | |||
AMSTAR | |||||||||||||
Winkelmayer22 | To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of renal replacement therapy | 13 observational and economic modeling studies | Yes | Not mentioned | No, search restricted to English | Yes | Yes included No excluded | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | No |
Mowatt24 | To assess the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of home HD compared with HD carried out in a hospital or satellite unit | 27 reviews, comparative observational studies and randomized crossover trial | Yes | Yes | Non-English studies identified but not evaluated | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Funding source listed no conflict of interest statement |
Murtagh14 | To identify the prevalence of symptoms in patients with ESRD on HD, non-dialytic management and discontinuing dialysis | 60 prospective and retrospective cross sectional data one of which collected longitudinal data | Yes | Study selection No data extraction Yes on a random sample | No, search restricted to English | No | Yes included No excluded | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No |
Lazarides21 | To compare outcomes of various angioaccess procedures in elderly patients | 13 cohort observational studies | Yes | No | No, search restricted to English | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
Schmitt19 | To determine the incidence of non-recovery of kidney function after acute kidney injury | 17 retrospective cohort and randomized controlled trials | Yes | Yes | No, search restricted to English | Yes | Yes included No excluded | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
Morton9 | To synthesize and analyze the views of patients and caregivers on decision making and choice for treatments in patients with chronic kidney disease | 18 qualitative studies | Yes | Yes | No, search restricted to English | No | Yes included No excluded | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
Johnson20 | To formulate and express a prognostic assessment for a patient with acute renal failure requiring RRT in the Intensive care unit | 41 cohort, and RCT studies | Yes | No | No, search restricted to English | Yes | Yes included No excluded | Yes but just number of patients, setting and outcomes, not study type | No | No | Yes | No | Yes |
Menzin23 | To identify interventions in chronic kidney disease that provide reasonable value and potential to lower cost and improve quality | 84 observational and economic modeling studies | Yes | Yes | No, search restricted to English | Yes | No | Some, description, time horizon perspective but not study type | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
O’Connor18 | To summarize evidence on non-dialytic management of ESRD regarding prognosis and QoL | 13 cohort, cross sectional and observational studies | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes included No excluded | Yes | Yes | Yes | N/A | No | Yes |
Notes: Ninety-two citations identified in Ovid Medline In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus. Eighty-three citations excluded by review of title and abstract. Nine articles reviewed. Five articles excluded based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two nonsystematic reviews. Two reviews comparing specific dialysis techniques. One review assessing reasons for late referral. Four articles selected. Two additional articles identified through review of references. Three additional articles identified through expert colleagues. Nine articles included in final review.
Abbreviations: AMSTAR, a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews; ESRD, end-stage renal disease; HD, hemodialysis; QoL, quality of life; RRT, renal replacement therapy; RCT, randomized controlled trial.