Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 3.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2011 Sep 16;301(5):H2081–H2092. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00706.2011

Table 1.

Evolution of body weight, plasma lipids and glucose levels, HR, SBP, and pulse pressure in mice

Weight, g Total cholesterol, mmol/l LDL cholesterolmmol/l HDL cholesterol, mmol/l Triglycerides, mmol/l Glucose, mmol/l Average 24-h HR, beats/min SBP, mmHg Pulse, mmHg
3-mo WT 27 ± 1 (12) 2.1 ± 0.2 (4) 0.1 ± 0.1 (4) 1.6 ± 0.1 (4) 1.2 ± 0.2 (4) 18.1 ± 2.7 (4) 543 ± 15 (6) 137 ± 6 (6) 31.0 ± 1.7 (6)
3-mo ATX 27 ± 1 (15) 16.2 ± 1.1 (4) 9.8 ± 0.5 (4) 1.9 ± 0.1 (4) 7.8 ± 0.6 (4) 16.2 ± 1.7 (4) 522 ± 10 (10) 147 ± 2 (23) 31.6 ± 0.8 (23)
6-mo WT 38 ± 1 (20) 2.3 ± 0.2 (9) 0.7 ± 0.2 (9) 1.2 ± 0.1 (9) 0.8 ± 0.1 (4) 24.0 ± 2.4 (9) 532 ± 12 (7) 127 ± 3 (7) 30.3 ± 1.9 (6)
6-mo ATX 31 ± 1* (20) 16.1 ± 1.0* (9) 10.1 ± 0.8* (9) 1.6 ± 0.1* (9) 7.4 ± 0.8* (9) 13.8 ± 2.2* (9) 504 ± 15 (7) 149 ± 4* (11) 32.9 ± 1.0 (6)
6-mo ATX + IVA 33 ± 1 (11) 16.1 ± 1.9 (4) 10.3 ± 1.3 (4) 1.9 ± 0.1 (4) 7.1 ± 0.6 (4) 9.6 ± 1.3 (4) 434 ± 10§ (6) 149 ± 6 (6) 33.7 ± 1.0 (11)
6-mo ATX + METO 32 ± 1 (11) 20.2 ± 1.0§ (4) 13.5 ± 0.5§ (9) 1.7 ± 0.1 (4) 9.0 ± 0.6 (4) 11.0 ± 1.6 (4) 439 ± 7§ (6) 150 ± 5 (6) 37.1 ± 2.1 (6)
6-mo ATX + PT 31 ± 1 (6) 17.8 ± 2.1 (5) 11.4 ± 2.0 (5) 1.6 ± 0.1 (5) 7.5 ± 0.8 (5) 15.4 ± 3.0 (5) 516 ± 30 (3) 159 ± 4 (6) 33.0 ± 1.2 (6)

Results are means ± SE of (n) mice. HR, heart rate (telemetry); SBP, systolic blood pressure (tail-cuff); Pulse, pulse pressure (tail-cuff); WT: wild-type mice; ATX: LDLr−/−:hApoB+/+ mice; ATX + IVA: LDLr−/−:hApoB+/+ mice treated with ivabradine (15 mg · kg−1 · day−1); ATX + METO: LDLr−/−:hApoB+/+ mice treated with metoprolol (80 mg · kg−1 · day−1); ATX + PT: LDLr−/−:hApoB+/+ mice subjected to 3 mo of voluntary physical training.

P < 0.05 vs. 3-mo WT;

*

P < 0.05 vs. 6-mo WT;

P < 0.05 vs. 3-mo ATX;

§

P < 0.05 vs. 6-mo ATX.