Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 27;17(5):1167–1176. doi: 10.1017/S136898001300075X

Table 3.

Multilevel regression results of the associations of individual-level factors, neighbourhood poverty and distance to grocery shop with unfair treatment at food outlets

Model 1 Model 2
Variable OR 95 % CI P OR 95 % CI P
Individual†
Age 0·99 0·97, 1·01 0·99 0·97, 1·01
Gender (Ref: Male)
Female 0·65 0·42, 1·01 0·64 0·41, 1·01
Race/ethnicity (Ref: African-American)‡
Latino 0·39 0·17, 0·92 * 0·35 0·12, 1·04
White 0·55 0·32, 0·93 * 0·50 0·22, 1·12
Marital status (Ref: Not currently married)
Currently married 0·73 0·41, 1·30 0·72 0·41, 1·28
Education (Ref: <High school or GED diploma)
High-school graduate or GED diploma 0·94 0·55, 1·61 0·92 0·54, 1·58
>High school 0·66 0·35, 1·25 0·64 0·34, 1·22
Employment (Ref: Not currently employed)
Currently employed 1·22 0·79, 1·88 1·22 0·79, 1·89
Annual household income per capita (Ref: <$US 4500)
$US 4500–7499 0·68 0·34, 1·35 0·67 0·34, 1·34
$US 7500–16 200 0·92 0·43, 1·97 0·94 0·45, 1·95
>$US 16 200 0·42 0·21, 0·84 * 0·43 0·22, 0·85 *
Automobile ownership (Ref: No)
Owns automobile 1·08 0·70, 1·66 1·06 0·69, 1·63
Home ownership (Ref: No)
Owns home 0·83 0·55, 1·25 0·84 0·55, 1·28
Length of residence in Detroit 1·00 0·98, 1·02 0·99 0·97, 1·02
Distance to grocery shop 1·07 1·00, 1·13 * 1·05 0·97, 1·04
Latino × distance to grocery shop 1·03 0·88, 1·19
White × distance to grocery shop 1·02 0·86, 1·21
Neighbourhood/census block group
Racial/ethnic composition (Ref: Other)
Predominantly African-American 0·87 0·48, 1·56 0·85 0·47, 1·54
Poverty level (Ref: Low poverty)
Moderately poor 0·66 0·40, 1·07 0·62 0·37, 1·12
High poverty 0·70 0·40, 1·21 0·69 0·39, 1·24

Ref., reference category; GED, General Educational Development.

*P < 0·05, ** P < 0·01, *** P < 0·001.

†All individual-level variables are grand-mean centred.

‡Other race/ethnicity not shown due to small sample size.