Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 4.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Med. 2010 Jul;85(7):1112–1117. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181e16103

Table 1.

Number, proportion, and direction of changes in physicians’ diagnostic opinions across the case presentation as a function of experience level (N=256 primary care physicians practicing in North or South Carolina in 2007/2008).

Experience
level
Initial
impression*
Final diagnosis
same as initial
impression
Final diagnosis
changed to CHD
after mid-point of
case
Final diagnosis
changed to non-
CHD diagnosis
after mid-point
Less experienced (N=128) CHD (N=70) 48 (68.6%) 22 (31.4%)
Not CHD (N=58) 23 (39.7%) 21 (36.2%) 14 (24.1%)
More experienced (N=128) CHD (N=84) 72 (85.7%) 12 (14.3%)
Not CHD (N=44) 19 (43.2%) 14 (31.8%) 11 (25.0%)
*

The initial impression corresponds to the diagnosis given at the mid-point of the case presentation at which time the video was stopped and participants were asked to provide their primary diagnosis, rate their certainty in that diagnosis, and indicate the most important piece of additional information they would like to receive. After that point the video was played to completion. Reading across rows indicates how many participants in each experience group indicated CHD (or not) as their initial impression and how many of those retained their initial impression or changed their diagnosis during the second half of the case presentation.