Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 25;13:147. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-13-147

Table 4.

Nature and number of addiction systems according to ESBL type and replicon type identified in the recipient strains

  Addiction modules, n
ESBL type
 n
 pemKIa
 ccdAB
 hok-sokb
 pndAC
 vagCDc
 Total
 Meand
All
 144
 84
 29
 51
 5
 18
 187
 1.29
TEM-26
 2
 2
 0
 0
 0
 0
 2
  
SHV
 39
 12*
 9
 7*
 0
 3
 31
 0.79
SHV-2a
 9
 1
  
  
  
  
 1
  
SHV-12
 30
 11
 9
 7
 0
 3
 30
 1.00
CTX-M
 103
 70
 20
 44
 5
 15
 154
 1.46
CTX-M-14
 15
 6
 0
 0
 2
 0
 8
 0.53
CTX-M-15
 88
 64
 20
 44
 3
 15
 143
 1.62
Replicon type
 n
 pemKIe
 ccdABf
 hok-sokg
 pndAC
 vagCDh
 Total
 Meani
A/C
 5
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
  
N
 4
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
  
L/M
 14
 9
 0
 0
 0
 0
 9
 0.64
IND
 15
 4
 0
 1
 0
 0
 5
 0.33
I1
 5
 2
 0
 0
 5
 2
 9
 1.80
HI2
 16
 0
 0
 0
 0
 2
 2
 0.12
F
 85
 69
 29
 50
 0
 14
 162
 1.90
SHV
 12
 10
 9
 6
 0
 1
 26
 2.16
CTX-M
 73
 59
 20
 44
 0
 13
 136
 1.87
  FII
 49
 40
 1
 32
 0
 1
 74
 1.51
   CTX-M-15
 48
  
  
  
  
 1
  
  
  FII-FIB
 4
 2
 1
 2
 0
 0
 5
 1.25
   SHV-2a
 1
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
  
  
   CTX-M-15
 3
 2
 1
 2
 0
 0
  
  
  FII-FIA-FIB
 18
 15
 14
 11
 0
 9
 49
 2.72
   SHV-12
 3
 3
 2
 3
  
 0
  
  
   CTX-M-15
 15
 12
 12
 9
  
 9
  
  
  FII-FIA
 9
 8
 8
 3
 0
 4
 23
 2.55
   SHV-12
 5
 5
 4
 1
  
 1
  
  
   CTX-M-15
 4
 3
 4
 2
  
 3
  
  
  FIA-FIB
 5
 4
 5
 2
 0
 0
 11
 2.20
   SHV-12
 3
 2
 3
 2
  
  
  
  
   CTX-M15 2 2 2 0        

apemKI: CTX-M vs SHV, p < 0.001; CTX-M-15 vs other ESBLs, p < 0.001.

bhok-sok: CTX-M vs SHV, p < 0.01; CTX-M-15 vs other ESBLs, p < 0.001.

cvagCD: CTX-M vs SHV, p =0.23; CTX-M-15 vs other ESBLs, p = 0.03.

d Mean: CTX-M vs SHV, p <0.001; CTX-M-15 vs other ESBLs, p < 0.001.

epemKI: IncF vs other plasmids, p < 0.001.

fccdAB: IncF vs other plasmids, p < 0.001.

ghok-sok: IncF vs other plasmids, p < 0.001.

hvagCD: IncF vs other plasmids, p = 0.08, vagCD: IncF and IncI1 vs other plasmids, p = 0.01.

i Mean: IncF vs other plasmids, p < 0.001.