Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013 Mar 15;132(0):301–308. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.02.021

Table 2.

Estimated Multinomial Logistic Regression Coefficients of Risk Correlates for a Five Class Smoking Typology based on Pseudo-Class Membership

Light Users
(18%)
 Late Users
(16%)
 Early Users
(10%)
 Late Heavy Users
(2%)
Reference group:
Non-users (54%)		 OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Maternal smoking 1.29*** 1.15-1.46 1 44*** 1.27-1.65 1.83*** 1.54-2.18 1.56** 1.12-2.19
Peer smoking 1.44*** 1.36-1.53 1.74*** 1.64-1.85 2.22*** 2.05-2.40 1.71*** 1.48-1.97
Conduct problems 1.24*** 1.18-1.30 1.28*** 1.22-1.34 1.30*** 1.23-1.38 1.33*** 1.20-1.47
Depressive Symptoms 1.05 0.89-1.24 1.30** 1.08-1.55 1.54*** 1.25-1.90 1.85** 1.26-2.72
Tobacco marketing
 legislation		 1.00 0.88-1.13 0.98 0.85-1.12 1.04 0.87-1.25 1.23 0.87-1.75
State prevalence of
 adolescents
 smoking		 1.03* 1.00-1.05 1.06*** 1.04-1.09 1.08*** 1.05-1.12 1.13*** 1.07-1.20
State cigarette tax (in
 25 cent units)		 0.94 0.87-1.01 1.00 0.93-1.07 0.95 0.87-1.05 0.98 0.81-1.18

Note. OR= odds ratio; Coefficients above were values after controlling the influences from individual demographic background (gender, ethnicity, parental education, and family structure).

*

p < .05

**

p < .01

***

p < .001