Table 1.
Agent | Dose (ppm) | pg PGE2/μg Protein | % of UV Control | % BrdU positive cells | % of UV control |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
no UV | 404 ± 90a | 21.6 | 2.4 ± 0.13a | 15.7 | |
UV | 1872 ± 391 | 100.0 | 15.3 ± 0.96 | 100.0 | |
Indo + UV | 4 | 126 ± 37a | 6.7 | 4.8 ± 0.64a | 31.3 |
Celecoxib + UV | 125 | 1716 ± 84 | 91.7 | nd | nd |
Celecoxib + UV | 250 | 818 ± 51a | 43.7 | nd | nd |
Celecoxib + UV | 500 | 681 ± 125a | 36.4 | nd | nd |
Nap + UV | 100 | 274 ± 84a | 14.6 | 7.2 ± 1.48a | 47.1 |
Nap + UV | 200 | 168 ± 34a | 9.0 | nd | nd |
Nap + UV | 400 | 114 ± 54a | 6.1 | 6.7 ±1.36a | 44.1 |
NO-Nap + UV | 100 | 653 ± 57a | 34.9 | 12.3 ± 2.24 | 80.4 |
NO-Nap + UV | 200 | 440 ± 87a | 23.5 | nd | nd |
NO-Nap + UV | 400 | 336 ± 53a | 17.9 | 6.8 ± 2.23a | 44.4 |
Asp + UV | 60 | 1270 ± 106b | 67.8 | 5.4 ± 2.06a | 35.3 |
Asp + UV | 250 | 701 ± 53a | 37.4 | nd | nd |
Asp + UV | 750 | 337 ± 61a | 18.0 | 8.1 ± 1.31a | 52.6 |
NO-Asp + UV | 108 | 1267 ± 118a | 67.7 | 10.1 ±1.02a | 66.0 |
NO-Asp + UV | 450 | 232 ± 43a | 12.4 | nd | nd |
NO-Asp + UV | 1350 | 162 ± 38a | 8.7 | 9.7 ± 1.15a | 63.3 |
Sul + UV | 25 | 402 ± 196a | 21.5 | 8.3 ± 0.31a | 54.2 |
Sul + UV | 75 | 174 ± 52a | 9.3 | 8.4 ± 0.68a | 54.9 |
Sul + UV | 150 | 69 ± 20a | 3.7 | 4.4 ± 0.70a | 29.0 |
For PGE2 analysis, groups of 6-8 mice fed their respective experimental diets for 1 week were exposed to 220 mJ/cm2 UV (except the no UV group) and killed 6 hr later. The epidermis was chipped from frozen skin, PGE2 extracted and subjected to enzyme immunoassay as described under Methods and Materials. For BrdU labeling, groups of 3-4 mice fed their respective experimental diets for 1 week were exposed to 220 mJ/cm2 UV (except the no UV group) and killed 24 hrs later. All mice were injected with BrdU 1 hr prior to killing. Sections of skin were processed for immunohistochemical staining for BrdU. The number of BrdU positive basal cells and total number of basal cells per field were counted. The values represent the mean percentage of positive basal cells ± std. dev. The UV controls were statistically significantly different (p<0.01) from the no UV group. All other groups were compared to the UV only group. The statistical differences are shown by superscripts:
p<0.01
p<0.05.
nd = not determined.