Table 1.
Strategy | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|
Select subjects with low-to-undetectable anti-AAV NAb. | Enrollment of NAb-negative subjects has been effective in allowing successful gene transfer. | Antibody assays are relatively insensitive (risk of false negatives) particularly for AAV serotypes performing poorly in vitro56; |
More than 50% of humans develop anti-AAV humoral immunity after the age of 3,53,55 and thus exclusion of those with antibodies restricts the patient population. | ||
Administer high vector doses. | Simple approach that may be effective in the presence of low-titer NAb. | High vector doses may trigger anticapsid CTL responses4,15,95,128; |
Relatively low-titer antibodies (1:5-1:17) can neutralize large doses of vector.15,39 | ||
Use empty capsids to adsorb anti-AAV antibodies, thus allowing for vector transduction. | Effectively overcomes humoral immunity to AAV119; | Increase antigen load in target organ, thus potentially triggering anticapsid T-cell immunity.95 |
Does not require any pharmacologic intervention; | ||
Empty capsids are an easy-to-manufacture by-product of AAV vector production. | ||
Administer IS to prevent or eradicate humoral immune responses to AAV.65 | Drugs selectively targeting B cells and plasma cells are approved for use in humans66; | Potential risks associated with systemic IS; Risks associated with blocking the induction of regulatory T cells with IS 67,91; |
The approach has been shown to be at least partially effective.40 | ||
Many IS drugs, particularly biologics, are not effective in animal models of gene transfer, making modeling IS strategies in animals difficult; | ||
Not effective in the complete eradication of preexisting high-titer NAb.40 | ||
Switch AAV serotype62 or engineer AAV capsids that are less susceptible to NAb.68,69 | This approach has been shown to be effective in some instances.70 | Switching or altering the capsid may modify significantly the AAV vector tissue tropism; |
Anti-AAV capsid antibodies are highly cross-reactive among serotypes.21 | ||
Use repeated plasma exchange cycles to adsorb immunoglobulins and therefore reduce the anti-AAV antibody titer. | Does not require IS; | Requires several cycles of plasmapheresis to achieve significant drop in antibody titer; |
Relatively safe, noninvasive procedure; | ||
Effective in dropping anti-AAV antibody titer.71 | Does not completely eradicate high-titer anti-AAV antibodies.71 | |
Use delivery techniques such as balloon catheters followed by saline flushing to isolate the target tissue from the systemic circulation to avoid vector dilution in blood and exposure to NAb.72 | Limits systemic exposure to the vector. | Relatively invasive, safety in diseased target organs/tissues needs to be assessed; |
Not useful if systemic gene transfer is required for therapeutic efficacy, not feasible for all target tissues. |
CTL, cytotoxic T lymphocyte; IS, immunosuppression.