Table 3.
Quotes Representative of the Effect of Workload and Reduced Endoscopic Capacity
| Patient harm |
| So what annoyed me so much about this is because, I mean, his cancer is just invading the stocks so if he would have had the colonoscopy quicker it would have prevented the cancer. (Provider 9) |
| Cause [sic] what if you wait 6 months for a barium enema and in six months it turns out something’s positive and then you wait for one month or two months to get a colonoscopy? It’s bad for the patient. (Provider 8) |
| Sympathy for the GI Department |
| And I understand from the GI clinicians’ standpoint that they are overwhelmed by the number of GI bleeds and just overwhelmed by the number of cases they have to do. I understand that completely. (Provider 1) |
| We know GI takes a little longer because they have so many patients and the doctors are a little busy. (Provider 6) |
| I mean, I’m not blaming anybody. We understand the burden that they’re in. (Provider 7) |
| I just think the system is over impacted and that’s the problem. (Provider 10) |
| Lack of Resources |
| It’s just the resources…I mean if you don’t have anything there…you just can’t. (Provider 4) |
| It’s resources. I mean they put the guidelines, they look very nice but in reality you cannot apply it. In real life everybody should have a colonoscopy when you reach fifty. But we don’t have it here. Even if you [have a] rectal bleed, hem [sic] positive stool [you get a] barium enema. Then you would take it from there. We cannot implement because there’s no resources. (Provider 3) |
| You know, to be honest with you, we all kind of know what needs to be done it’s just a matter of whether we have the availability. (Provider 10) |