Table 5.
|
|
p CT optimization |
r CT optimization |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sample type |
Beam modality |
Mean |
Volume with dose |
Mean |
Volume with dose |
dose [%] | <90 % [ % ] | dose [%] | <90 % [ % ] | ||
meat sample 1 |
carbon |
96.5 |
8.4 |
99.0 |
0.7 |
|
proton |
96.2 |
8.3 |
99.3 |
0.0 |
meat sample 2 |
carbon |
96.7 |
4.6 |
99.0 |
0.1 |
|
proton |
96.2 |
6.0 |
98.9 |
0.4 |
meat sample 3 |
carbon |
97.4 |
3.4 |
98.8 |
0.3 |
proton | 97.3 | 2.4 | 98.8 | 0.2 |
Plans were optimized on pCT as well as rCT and both optimizations were recalculated on r CT for comparison of parameters.