Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 5;8(7):e68220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068220

Table 6. Effects of shading on starch pasting viscosity of rice flour in Experiment 2 (2009).

Varieties Treatments PKV (RVU) HPV (RVU) CPV (RVU) SBV (RVU) BDV (RVU) PaT (°C)
IIyou 498 CK 369.93±0.63a 231.12±6.01a 441.42±2.79a 71.49±2.63a 138.81±5.43a 78.37±0.04a
Shade at TE 374.46±10.58a 224.20±3.28a 439.26±5.00a 64.81±7.59a 150.26±10.49a 78.25±0.26a
Shade at BH 374.22±10.73a 228.28±4.18a 444.63±13.50a 70.40±2.92a 145.94±8.67a 77.98±0.03a
Gangyou 188 CK 351.54±10.06a 208.00±5.79a 375.85±2.36a 24.31±12.40b 143.54±15.65b 78.59±0.75b
Shade at TE 362.67±5.30a 194.61±12.63ab 373.31±8.13a 10.64±12.19c 165.10±12.95a 78.39±0.02b
Shade at BH 308.14±3.15b 181.91±8.39b 349.03±6.98b 40.89±5.15a 126.24±7.12c 79.77±0.2a
Gangyou 527 CK 373.61±3.33a 209.49±5.76a 407.33±7.12a 33.72±5.30b 164.13±2.57a 78.34±0.04b
Shade at TE 380.64±2.57a 203.87±10.82a 397.83±6.71a 17.19±4.43c 176.77±8.41a 78.79±0.50ab
Shade at BH 231.19±3.57b 135.44±0.97b 281.05±6.26b 49.86±2.70a 95.75±4.47b 79.00±0.22a
Chuanxiang 9838 CK 354.33±13.38a 217.64±19.43a 405.24±10.96b 50.90±2.66b 136.70±6.85a 78.13±0.20b
Shade at TE 350.87±2.39a 219.75±0.54a 425.33±4.02a 74.46±1.82a 131.13±2.84a 78.50±0.35b
Shade at BH 302.00±3.17b 196.34±9.59b 382.17±5.06c 80.17±2.28a 105.67±6.59b 79.87±0.36a
F-value V 70.06** 43.62** 238.24** 120.09** 13.22** 8.68**
G 301.80** 41.27** 146.89** 28.82** 61.83** 20.88**
V×G 77.86** 12.16** 58.01** 9.10** 14.91** 7.61**

TE, tillering-elongation stage; BH, booting-heading stage; V, variety; G, growth stage; PKV, peak viscosity; HPV, hold viscosity; CPV, final viscosity; SBV, setback; BDV, breakdown; PaT, pasting temperature; and RVU, rapid visco units.

Values in columns represent the significant differences between CK and shading treatments, (p<0.05). Means ± standard, n = 3.

**

significant at 0.01 level.