Table 7. Effects of shading on starch pasting viscosity of rice flour at heading-maturity stage (2010).
Varieties | Treatments | PKV (RVU) | HPV (RVU) | CPV (RVU) | SBV (RVU) | BDV (RVU) | PaT (°C) |
IIyou 498 | CK | 225.38±1.17a | 129.75±3.18a | 261.25±2.00a | 35.88±3.71a | 95.63±4.89a | 76.45±0.64b |
Shading | 219.30±1.12b | 133.38±1.71a | 257.54±3.59a | 38.17±4.71a | 86.00±0.59b | 77.60±0.07a | |
Gangyou 188 | CK | 210.42±1.30a | 122.42±2.83a | 244.42±0.71a | 34.00±0.59a | 88.00±4.12a | 77.38±0.60a |
Shading | 173.42±2.59b | 98.17±1.41b | 202.59±1.30b | 29.17±3.89a | 75.25±4.01b | 78.33±0.11a | |
Gangyou 527 | CK | 215.13±0.06a | 119.00±3.30a | 241.54±1.12a | 26.42±1.06a | 96.13±3.24a | 77.70±0.07b |
Shading | 205.59±0.82b | 112.25±1.30b | 227.71±1.94b | 22.13±1.12a | 93.34±0.47a | 78.83±0.67a | |
Chuanxiang 9838 | CK | 232.50±0.94a | 127.63±1.71a | 260.42±1.89a | 27.92±0.94a | 104.88±0.77a | 76.88±0.11a |
Shading | 221.25±1.65b | 128.38±4.89a | 253.50±6.25b | 32.25±7.90a | 92.88±6.54b | 77.70±0.07a | |
Dexiang 4103 | CK | 216.04±1.36b | 92.00±1.18a | 171.38±1.00a | −44.67±0.35a | 124.05±0.18a | 71.30±0.07a |
Shading | 220.13±4.30a | 97.09±0.12a | 171.88±1.24a | −48.25±5.54a | 123.05±4.42a | 71.68±0.67a | |
F-value | L | 290.34** | 15.14** | 170.89** | 0.94 | 31.02** | 20.60** |
V | 306.89** | 143.45** | 998.46** | 613.49** | 104.77** | 162.38** | |
L×V | 94.31** | 23.67** | 56.13* | 2.23 | 3.11 | 0.52 |
L, light intensity; V, variety; PKV, peak viscosity; HPV, hold viscosity; CPV, final viscosity; SBV, setback; BDV, breakdown; PaT, pasting temperature; and RVU, rapid visco units.
Values in columns represent the significant differences between CK and shading treatments, (p<0.05). Means ± standard, n = 2.
significant at 0.01 level;
,significant at 0.05 level.