Table 8. Effects of shading on starch pasting viscosity of rice flour during 30 d after heading (2011).
Varieties | Treatments | PKV (RVU) | HPV (RVU) | CPV (RVU) | SBV (RVU) | BDV (RVU) | PaT (°C) |
IIyou 498 | CK | 258.08±2.34a | 148.47±2.79a | 279.58±3.98a | 21.50±2.30b | 109.61±1.57a | 77.55±0.05a |
Shading | 234.42±2.73b | 138.89±6.77b | 274.31±3.90b | 39.89±5.19a | 95.53±8.56b | 77.57±0.10a | |
Gangyou 188 | CK | 223.06±2.96a | 136.50±4.33a | 281.44±2.04b | 58.39±0.92b | 86.56±2.28a | 78.28±0.03b |
Shading | 193.14±2.12b | 132.25±4.45a | 310.97±1.93a | 117.83±3.99a | 60.89±6.56b | 80.78±0.03a | |
Gangyou 527 | CK | 211.75±2.82a | 118.75±6.17a | 264.67±3.84a | 52.92±3.06b | 93.00±4.45a | 79.95±0.05b |
Shading | 191.58±0.29b | 112.83±3.56b | 260.56±2.36a | 68.97±2.56a | 78.75±3.77b | 80.78±0.03a | |
Chuanxiang 9838 | CK | 228.64±1.55a | 130.17±7.30a | 292.61±7.68a | 63.97±6.78a | 98.47±6.84a | 78.32±0.03b |
Shading | 223.31±1.75b | 122.28±1.35b | 279.58±1.61b | 56.28±2.80b | 101.03±2.03a | 79.37±0.03a | |
Dexiang 4103 | CK | 247.03±2.95a | 97.78±6.83a | 175.14±7.17a | −71.89±4.25b | 149.25±3.90a | 71.80±0.09a |
Shading | 226.92±3.17b | 92.42±1.96b | 167.94±1.73b | −58.97±1.54a | 134.50±1.23b | 72.10±0.56a | |
F-value | L | 623.92** | 46.55** | 0.00 | 271.52** | 92.30** | 181.55** |
V | 449.79** | 298.79** | 1951.51** | 1966.68** | 278.84** | 1842.82** | |
L×V | 25.90** | 0.97 | 54.96** | 82.61** | 10.74** | 38.21** |
L, light intensity; V, variety; PKV, peak viscosity; HPV, hold viscosity; CPV, final viscosity; SBV, setback; BDV, breakdown; PaT, pasting temperature; and RVU, rapid visco units.
Values in columns represent the significant differences between CK and shading treatments, (p<0.05). Means ± standard, n = 3.
significant at 0.01 level.