Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 30.
Published in final edited form as: Stat Med. 2013 Jan 18;32(17):2971–2987. doi: 10.1002/sim.5740

Table 2.

Relative mean squared prediction error based on moments (PEM) and reconstruction (PER) estimates for the three simulation set-ups: case (a) general unsynchronized binary response, case (b) general unsynchronized count response and case (c) unsynchronized binary response with diagonal support analogous to the CDS data. Percentiles of the deviation measures presented are estimated from 200 Monte Carlo runs/data sets.

Case n σ2 PEM PER
Med 25% 75% Med 25% 75%
(a) 100 2 .013 .008 .021 .012 .008 .019
(a) 100 4 .013 .008 .022 .012 .007 .019
(a) 100 6 .015 .009 .025 .012 .007 .020

(a) 200 2 .008 .005 .013 .007 .004 .011
(a) 200 4 .009 .006 .015 .007 .004 .011
(a) 200 6 .010 .006 .017 .007 .004 .011

(b) 100 2 .005 .003 .008 .004 .003 .007
(b) 100 4 .005 .003 .009 .004 .002 .006
(b) 100 6 .007 .004 .011 .004 .002 .006

(b) 200 2 .003 .002 .005 .002 .001 .004
(b) 200 4 .004 .002 .006 .002 .002 .004
(b) 200 6 .005 .003 .007 .002 .001 .004

(c) 200 2 .043 .012 .129 .054 .014 .156
(c) 200 4 .050 .013 .161 .055 .015 .160
(c) 200 6 .058 .015 .202 .051 .014 .161

(c) 400 2 .033 .008 .100 .045 .012 .132
(c) 400 4 .042 .011 .137 .047 .013 .138
(c) 400 6 .046 .012 .161 .042 .011 .124