Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 7.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurol. 2011 Aug 18;259(2):267–276. doi: 10.1007/s00415-011-6172-0

Table 3.

p values and effect sizes for group comparisons of saccade performance

Measure Direction ANCOVA CAG− versus Far
Far versus Near
Near versus HD
p value p value Effect size p value Effect size p value Effect size
Antisaccades
 % Errors Hrz < 0.0001 0.3 −0.20 0.02 0.59 0.02 0.57
Vrt 0.0004 0.2 −0.24 0.2 0.27 0.002 0.75
 Latency (ms) Hrz 0.03 0.2 −0.12 0.02 0.56 0.2 0.24
Vrt 0.0002 0.3 −0.09 0.005 0.71 0.09 0.42
 Variability of latency (ms) Hrz 0.2 NS 0.36 NS 0.07 NS 0.22
Vrt 0.02 0.07 0.52 0.5 −0.002 0.06 0.40
Memory guided saccades
 % Errors Hrz 0.005 0.5 0.04 0.01 0.56 0.5 0.08
Vrt 0.04 0.1 0.60 0.2 0.11 0.4 0.19
 Latency (ms) Hrz 0.01 0.4 0.16 0.1 0.29 0.07 0.45
Vrt 0.05 0.2 −0.20 0.06 0.52 0.1 0.43
 Variability of latency (ms) Hrz 0.1 NS 0.46 NS 0.05 NS 0.10
Vrt 0.03 0.4 −0.05 0.1 0.30 0.004 0.68

Bolded values indicate effect sizes >0.5

NS indicates that ANCOVA was not significant, precluding further post hoc testing. Hrz horizontal, Vrt vertical