Table 2.
Contrast | Correction method | Structure | Side | k | x | y | z | Fmax | pcorr |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main effect of CS-emotion | ROI | OFC | R | 3 | 30 | 32 | −11 | 16.92 | 0.014 |
ROI | Insula | L | 2 | −42 | −13 | 10 | 15.17 | 0.027 | |
ROI | Insula | R | 2 | 45 | −7 | 4 | 19.50 | 0.005 | |
whole-brain | Occipital pole | L | 1296 | −15 | −97 | −5 | 271.66 | <0.001 | |
whole-brain | Occipital pole | R | 1291 | 18 | −94 | 1 | 149.59 | <0.001 | |
whole-brain | Lingual gyrus | L | 12 | −6 | −88 | −19 | 29.99 | 0.012 | |
whole-brain | Thalamus | R | 3 | 12 | −31 | 16 | 26.84 | 0.031 | |
Main effect of reward learning | ROI | dACC | L | 23 | −6 | −1 | 37 | 20.94 | 0.005 |
Interaction CS-emotion × reward learning | No significant effects |
Labeling of the results from the exploratory whole-brain analyses were performed using the probabilistic Harvard-Oxford Cortical and Subcortical Atlases. The significance threshold was pcorr < 0.05 (FWE-corrected). The cluster forming threshold was pcorr < 0.05 and k ≥ 5 voxel for the whole-brain analyses and puncorr < 0.001 and k ≥ 5 for the ROI analyses. All coordinates are given in MNI space.