Appendix A.
Table of statistical tests
| Meridian (HM, VM) × Cue position significant statistics | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cue condition | Measure | ANOVA effect or post-hoc comparison |
Statistic | Reported significance |
p-value 2-tailed |
| No-cue condition | Slopes | HM vs. VM | t(6) = 3.849 | p < .01 | .008 |
| Single cue condition | Zero points | Cue position | F(1,6) = 590 | p < .001 | .000 |
| PSEs | Cue position | F(1,6) = 116.1 | p < .001 | .000 | |
| Meridian × Cue position | F(1,6) = 7.553 | p < .05 | .033 | ||
| HM vs. VM Outside cue | t(6) = 3.344 | p < .05 | .016 | ||
| Slope | Meridian | F(1,6) = 9.582 | p < .05 | .021 | |
| Cue position | F(1,6) = 37.56 | p < .005 | .001 | ||
| HM vs. VM Inside cue | t(6) = 2.585 | p < .05 | .041 | ||
| HM vs. VM Outside cue | t(6) = 8.648 | p < .001 | .000 | ||
| Distributed cue condition | Zero points | Meridian | F(1,6) = 14.288 | p < .01 | .009 |
| Cue position | F(1,6) = 256 | p < .001 | .000 | ||
| Meridian × Cue position | F(1,6) = 12.26 | p < .05 | .013 | ||
| HM vs. VM Outside cue | t(6) = 3.984 | p < .01 | .007 | ||
| PSEs | Cue position | F(1,6) = 110 | p < .001 | .000 | |
| Meridian × Cue position | F(1,6) = 10.24 | p < .05 | .019 | ||
| HM vs. VM Outside cue | t(6) = 3.34 | p < .05 | .016 | ||
| Slopes | Meridian | F(1,6) = 57.73 | p < .001 | .000 | |
| Cue position | F(1,6) = 21.06 | p < .005 | .004 | ||
| Meridian × Cue position | F(1,6) = 9.92 | p < .05 | .02 | ||
| HM vs. VM Inside cue | t(6) = 5.289 | p < .005 | .002 | ||
| HM vs. VM Outside cue | t(6) = 8.468 | p < .001 | .000 | ||
| Single minus distributed cues | Zero points | Meridian | F(1,6) = 7.462 | p < .05 | .034 |
| Cue position | F(1,6) = 18.48 | p < .01 | .005 | ||
| Meridian × Cue position | F(1,6) = 21.376 | p < .005 | .005 | ||
| HM vs. VM Outside cue | t(6) = 4.416 | p < .005 | .004 | ||
| PSEs | Meridian | F(1,6) = 8.063 | p < .05 | .030 | |
| Vertical meridian segment (UVM, LVM) × Cue position significant statistics | |||||
| Cue condition | Measure | ANOVA effect or post-hoc comparison |
Statistic | Reported significance |
p-value 2-tailed |
| No-cue condition | Slopes | UVM vs. LVM | t(6) = 3.773 | p < .01 | .009 |
| Single cue condition | Zero points | Cue position | F(1,6) = 221 | p < .001 | .000 |
| PSEs | Cue position | F(1,6) =56.746 | p < .001 | .000 | |
| Slopes | VM segment | F(1,6) = 6.896 | p < .05 | .039 | |
| Cue position | F(1,6) = 25.515 | p < .005 | .002 | ||
| Distributed cue condition | Zero points | Cue position | F(1,6) = 116.855 | p < .001 | .000 |
| PSEs | Cue position | F(1,6) = 73.485 | p < .001 | .000 | |
| Slopes | Cue position | F(1,6) = 13.394 | p < .05 | .011 | |
| Single minus distributed cues | Zero points | Cue position | F(1,6) = 32.919 | p < .005 | .001 |
Note: HM = Horizontal Meridian, VM = Vertical Meridian, UVM = Upper Vertical Meridian, LVM = Lower Vertical Meridian.