Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Jul;146(1):9–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.12.069

Table 4B.

Statistics of logistic regression of chemotherapy on VATS successfulness

success vs. failure success vs. inadequate
sampling

p-
value
OR (95% CI) p-
value
OR (95% CI)
chemo therapy (<=2 vs. >2
cycles)
0.7544 0.8 (0.2, 3.4) 0.0059 0.1 (0, 0.5)
age 0.7428 1.0 (0.9, 1.1) 0.6509 1.0 (0.9, 1.1)
gender (male vs. female) 0.1068 0.3 (0.1, 1.3) 0.3872 0.5 (0.1, 2.3)
histology (adenocarcinomar vs.
others)
0.0598 3.8 (0.9, 15.6) 0.0273 7.2 (1.2, 41.4)

“Success” is equal to meeting protocol endpoints (i.e. disease found in pleura, disease in a mediastinal node, or 3 nodal stations sampled without disease). “Failure” is equal to not meeting protocol endpoints (i.e. biopsies were not obtained from 3 negative nodal stations or procedure aborted). “Inadequate sampling” means inability to sample 3 nodal stations secondary to the obliteration of nodal tissue.