Table 4B.
success vs. failure | success vs. inadequate sampling |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
p- value |
OR (95% CI) | p- value |
OR (95% CI) | |
chemo therapy (<=2 vs. >2 cycles) |
0.7544 | 0.8 (0.2, 3.4) | 0.0059 | 0.1 (0, 0.5) |
age | 0.7428 | 1.0 (0.9, 1.1) | 0.6509 | 1.0 (0.9, 1.1) |
gender (male vs. female) | 0.1068 | 0.3 (0.1, 1.3) | 0.3872 | 0.5 (0.1, 2.3) |
histology (adenocarcinomar vs. others) |
0.0598 | 3.8 (0.9, 15.6) | 0.0273 | 7.2 (1.2, 41.4) |
“Success” is equal to meeting protocol endpoints (i.e. disease found in pleura, disease in a mediastinal node, or 3 nodal stations sampled without disease). “Failure” is equal to not meeting protocol endpoints (i.e. biopsies were not obtained from 3 negative nodal stations or procedure aborted). “Inadequate sampling” means inability to sample 3 nodal stations secondary to the obliteration of nodal tissue.