Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 30;11:73. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-73

Table 4.

Models predicting phase 2 mental function

 
Model 1 R2=.06
Model 2 R2=.23
Model 3 R2=.40
  b SEMb β t b SEMb β t b SEMb β t
Age
.24
.06
.19
4.19**
.17
.05
.13
3.06*
.17
.05
.13
3.58**
Body Mass Index
15
.10
.07
1.40
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Mental Health Function (Phase 1)
 
14.
.07
.12
2.12*
.14
.05
.12
3.02**
Social Desirability
 
.32
.14
.11
2.36*
.32
.12
.11
2.65**
Negative Emotionality
 
.08
.03
.11
2.97**
.08
.03
.13
2.76**
Social Support
 
 
-.38
.10
-.17
-63**
Physical Symptoms (Phase 2)
 
 
-.33
.04
-.35
-8.12**
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms (Phase 2)      

** p < .001, * p < .05. Each successive step accounted for a significant increase in variance over the prior model (all ps < .05 or better). Overall final model adjusted R2 = 0.40. For the model predicting mental health function at Phase 2 we included the following Phase 1 variables: gender, age, BMI, mental health function at Phase 1, social desirability, negative emotionality, absorption, social support, approach coping, avoidance coping, pre-deployment life events, alcohol misuse, physical symptoms, diastolic blood pressure at Phase 1 and smoking. We also included the following Phase 2 variables: deployment experiences, combat experiences, physical symptoms and PTSD symptoms. Non-significant predictors were eliminated using a backward elimination method. Higher scores indicate better mental function.