Table 4.
Mechanism of the A allele |
Frequency of the A allele (x) |
Flock average WEC (epg) |
Regression coefficient (epg/yr) |
∆p |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year 1 | Year 20 | Estimate | s.e. | |||
E |
0.0 |
710 |
710 |
0.72 |
0.87 |
|
E |
0.1 |
640 |
670 |
3.21 |
0.80 |
Decrease |
E |
0.2 |
540 |
510 |
−1.07 |
0.58 |
|
E |
0.3 |
470 |
500 |
2.08 |
0.50 |
Decrease |
E |
0.4 |
380 |
430 |
1.16 |
0.45 |
|
E |
0.5 |
340 |
340 |
−0.17 |
0.50 |
|
E |
0.6 |
290 |
300 |
0.39 |
0.36 |
|
E |
0.7 |
250 |
260 |
1.02 |
0.37 |
|
E |
0.8 |
210 |
230 |
1.62 |
0.26 |
Increase |
E |
0.9 |
180 |
220 |
1.83 |
0.18 |
Increase |
E |
1.0 |
140 |
190 |
2.54 |
0.20 |
Increase |
M |
0.0 |
720 |
800 |
2.94 |
0.56 |
Decrease |
M |
0.1 |
640 |
650 |
1.22 |
0.65 |
|
M |
0.2 |
580 |
620 |
2.39 |
0.66 |
|
M |
0.3 |
500 |
480 |
−0.08 |
0.62 |
|
M |
0.4 |
440 |
440 |
−0.89 |
0.54 |
|
M |
0.5 |
370 |
370 |
−1.40 |
0.43 |
|
M |
0.6 |
340 |
350 |
1.81 |
0.39 |
Increase |
M |
0.7 |
290 |
310 |
1.07 |
0.27 |
Increase |
M |
0.8 |
260 |
320 |
3.62 |
0.24 |
Increase |
M |
0.9 |
220 |
300 |
4.35 |
0.30 |
Increase |
M |
1.0 |
180 |
290 |
5.53 |
0.29 |
Increase |
F |
0.0 |
720 |
800 |
2.94 |
0.56 |
Decrease |
F |
0.1 |
660 |
660 |
0.10 |
0.80 |
|
F |
0.2 |
570 |
540 |
−1.13 |
0.58 |
|
F |
0.3 |
480 |
520 |
4.02 |
0.63 |
Decrease |
F |
0.4 |
410 |
430 |
−0.52 |
0.53 |
|
F |
0.5 |
360 |
340 |
0.08 |
0.53 |
|
F |
0.6 |
310 |
320 |
−0.69 |
0.47 |
|
F |
0.7 |
250 |
240 |
−0.33 |
0.45 |
|
F |
0.8 |
230 |
210 |
0.55 |
0.37 |
|
F |
0.9 |
180 |
170 |
−0.30 |
0.29 |
|
F | 1.0 | 140 | 170 | 0.99 | 0.16 | Increase |
Postulated mechanisms to reduce WEC in sheep through the ‘resistance’ A allele: E = reduced worm establishment, M = increased worm mortality and F = reduced female worm fecundity; epg = eggs per gram; sh = 25%; sp = 10%; bold characters = coefficients significantly different to zero (P < 0.001) with the directional change in frequency for the alternate B allele in worms (∆p).