Table 5.
Telepathology portal access comparisons
General telepathology portal occasional user (asynchronous upload) | Custom/client telepathology portal large volume (imaging streaming) | |
---|---|---|
Pro | Simple, easy to use; readily available to submit consultation requests | Support of large consult volumes |
Real-time consultations; no need for image transfers | ||
Does not require any setup at the client site | Custom logic (case routing, historical data) and custom data for specialty pathology areas | |
No specific IT-level engagement needed | Bar coding, specimen identification automation to minimize risk of mislabeling | |
Workflow and hardware optimization | ||
No direct cost to implement | ||
With web-based collaboration tools, a highly interactive experience is possible | ||
Con | Limited automation; requires more user intervention | Implementation cost is higher |
Requires project level engagement between clients to resolve IT connectivity issues and installation of software at the remote site | ||
Potential long file upload times for whole slide images | ||
Limited ability to organize information; no custom data |