Skip to main content
. 2013 May 9;471(8):2578–2585. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3001-z

Table 1.

Intermodality conventional radiography versus EOS® ICCs by pincer size

Pincer size (mm) ICC (95% CI)*
Lateral center-edge angle Sharp angle Tönnis angle Retroversion index
0 0.88 (0.72–0.95) 0.71 (0.28–0.88) 0.79 (0.58–0.90) 0.87 (0.53–0.97)
2 0.92 (0.54–0.98) 0.76 (0.41–0.92) 0.89 (0.66–0.96) 0.92 (0.74–0.98)
4 0.93 (0.79–0.98) 0.86 (0.79–0.98) 0.89 (0.68–0.97) 0.98 (0.95–1.00)
6 0.89 (0.65–0.97) 0.90 (0.60–0.97) 0.90 (0.72–0.97) 0.97 (0.90–0.99)
8 0.94 (0.81–0.98) 0.77 (0.72–0.95) 0.85 (0.29–0.96) 0.95 (0.84–0.98)
10 0.94 (0.83–0.98) 0.71 (−0.05 to 0.92) 0.77 (0.41–0.92) 0.95 (0.84–0.98)
12 0.97 (0.89–0.99) 0.79 (0.02–0.95) 0.90 (0.71–0.97) 0.95 (0.85–0.98)

* All ICCs have a p < 0.001; ICC = intraclass correlation coefficient.