Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 9.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Hypertens. 2013 Jan;26(1):95–103. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hps023

Table 3.

Correlates of the Carotid and Aortic AIs

Carotid AI
Aortic AI
Correlates β ± SE P r2 β ± SE P r2
Longitudinal analysis
Being female 11.3 ± 2.2 <0.0001 10.3 14.9 ± 2.4 <0.0001 10.8
Age (+15 years) 12.4 ± 0.96 <0.0001 28.9 13.8 ± 1.14 <0.0001 29.6
Body height (+7 cm) −3.22 ± 0.84 <0.0001 1.49 −1.75 ± 0.91 0.03 0.41
Mean arterial pressure (+10 mm Hg) 3.41 ± 0.79 0.0001 1.42 2.28 ± 0.87 0.01 0.66
Smoking at baseline 6.80 ± 1.76 0.0001 1.39 8.85 ± 1.91 <0.0001 2.14
Cross-sectional analysis
Being female 10.2 ± 2.2 <0.0001 2.23 13.0 ± 2.4 <0.0001 10.4
Age (+15 years) 10.9 ± 0.90 <0.0001 33.2 13.7 ± 0.97 <0.0001 34.8
Body height (+7 cm) −3.85 ± 0.84 <0.0001 10.3 −2.45 ± 0.91 0.0053 0.64
Mean arterial pressure (+10 mm Hg) 5.59 ± 0.76 <0.0001 3.56 3.23 ± 0.84 <0.0001 1.46
Total cholesterol (+1 mmol/L) 2.54 ± 0.86 0.002 0.77
Smoking at follow-up 5.22 ± 1.69 0.002 0.79 8.23 ± 1.85 <0.0001 1.47

The AIs were standardized to a heart rate of 75 beats/min. The covariables considered for entry into the multiple regression model were sex, age, body height, mean arterial pressure, total cholesterol, current smoking and drinking, and antihypertensive drug treatment. β ± SE, P, and r2 indicate the effect size ±SE, statistical significance, and the percentage variance of the dependent variable explained by a single covariable, respectively. Effect sizes are expressed for a ~1 SD higher value of the explanatory variables. The percentage of variance explained by the whole model was 50.1% and 49.5% for the carotid and aortic AIs in the cross-sectional analysis, respectively, and 43.5% and 43.6% in the longitudinal analysis, respectively. Abbreviation: AI, augmentation index.