Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 9;4:181. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00181

Table 1.

Core- and hydrolysis-derived polar bGDGTs from sediments, in situ cellulose enrichments in GBS, and soil samples along a transect from the hot spring (Figure 1).

bGDGTs (ng/g dry wt)
Sample Temp (°C) pH Core Polar % Polarb
SEDIMENTS
Site A 82.0 6.6 12 3 21
Site B 79.2 6.8 50 13 21
Site C 72.1 7.1 38 8 17
Site D 82.0 7.2 25 6 19
Site E 61.9 7.2 282 53 16
ENRICHMENTSa
77AS 78.8 6.8 22 57 72
77AW 78.8 6.8 6 9 59
77CS 78.8 6.8 63 88 58
77CW 78.8 6.8 4 11 72
85AS 85.5 6.9 3 6 64
85AW 85.5 6.9 3 2 45
85CS 85.5 6.9 28 12 29
85CW 85.5 6.9 7 3 34
SOILS
Soil-0 cm NAd 8.2 NA NA NA
Soil-10 cm 33.6 7.8 149 8 5
Soil-20 cm 34.0 7.8 231 0 0
Soil-30 cm 30.9 7.4 319 7 2
Soil-50 cm NA NA 72 76 105
Soil-100 cm 31.7 8.2 NA NA NA
Soil-150 cm NA NA 2 0 6
Soil-200 cm 30.0 6.4 NA NA NA
Soil-300 cm NA NA 6 1 13
Soil-500 cm 30.5 9.2 NA NA NA
MAATc 10.7
a

Enrichment sample codes consist of three parameters: average temperature (77°C or 85°C), cellulose substrate (A, aspen shavings; C, core stover), and incubation location (W, suspended in water; S, buried in sediment); temperature and pH listed are those measured at the time of sample collection.

b

Hydrolysis-derived polar bGDGTs as a percentage of total (core + polar) bGDGTs.

c

Mean annual air temperature at Gerlach, Nevada (http://www.wunderground.com/weather-forecast/US/NV/Gerlach.html).

d

NA, not available.