Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 9.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Res Methods. 2012 Mar;44(1):110–123. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0096-6

Table 1.

Performance across the lifespan on measures of executive function

First Author Age (N) Findings
Lehto, Juujarvi, Kooistra, & Pulkkinen, 2003 8–13 (108) TMTa: B > A for completion times for each age group, no age effects
Yeudall et al., 1987 15–40 (225) TMTa: B > A for completion times for each age group, age effects
  for B time but not A
Tombaugh, 2004 18–89 (911) TMTa: B > A for completion times for each age group, gradual increase
  in B time starting at ages 65–69
Chelune and Baer, 1986 6–12 (105) WCSTa: PE decreased with age but was indistinguishable from adult
  norms at ages 10–12
Fisk and Sharp, 2004 20–85 (95) WCSTa: r = .24 between age and PE
Hartman et al., 2001 younger (85) and older (76)
  adults
WCSTa: older adults (mean age 70) made more PE and completed fewer
  categories than college students
Haaland et al., 1987 64–87 (75) WCSTa: healthy older adults (ages 80–87) completed fewer categories
  and made more errors relative to ages 64–69
Huizinga et al., 2006 7–21 (384) WCSTb: PE and categories completed decreased across ages
  ToL b: additional moves decrease with age up to 15, 15-and 21-year-olds
  equivalent
Korkman et al., 2001 5–12 (800) ToLa: improvement from ages 5 to 9
Malloy-Diniz et al., 2008 5–8 (371) ToLa: improvement across ages tested
Lehto et al., 2003 8–13 (108) ToLb: improvement across ages tested
DeLuca et al., 2003 8–64 (194) ToLb: optimal performance at ages 20–29 compared with ages 8–10 or 50–64

Note. TMT, Halstead–Reitan Trail Making Test; WCST, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test; PE, perseverative errors; ToL, Tower of London

a

physical

b

computerizedversion